Next Sunday is Elections in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Capital Federal and Buenos Aires still has some say. Communes are the units of decentralized political and administrative management of the city, with territorial jurisdiction, property and legal personality. While the Constitution were established by the City of Buenos Aires in 1996, were regulated only on September 1, 2005 by Act 1777.5 and as provided by this Act (later amended) the transition to these institutions should completed by May 31, 2007. In compliance with legal provisions, the Legislature of the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires passed Law 3223, dated 9/11/09, which calls for the communal elections autoridaddes June 5, 2011 regulated by Decree No. 1.003/09 of executive. Interestingly enough this is the first time that the executive of the city regulates the law calls for local elections. In February 2004, a process of discussion between city residents and members of 700 local organizations, to draft a governing communes. In relation to the key ideas of the discussions produced a summary document that lawmakers agreed to include in the law. Accordingly, and 16 bills residing in the legislature, a commission created specially drafted a consensus. The Municipalities Act was passed in the general form 30 November 2004 and June 8, 2005 were approved on an individual basis 51 of the articles. On 15 June the article refirido the female quota of Community Boards, while all the remaining current government articles and Annex I were adopted at the meeting of September 1, 2005. The communes will absorb the functions of existing management centers and Communal Participation (CGPC). The CGPC (formerly CGP) were decentralized agencies of the Government of the City, where procedures could be performed outside the central government areas in neighborhoods. Institutional participation of residents in the neighborhoods was with Neighborhood Councils, elected by direct vote between 1984 and 1992. As an example may be what happened in the CGPC 6. Besides the communities take charge of maintaining parks and side streets. And the design and implementation of social policies and cultural neighborhoods. They also have a corps of inspectors to control their own services, industries and businesses in the area, and have next to executive decision in the planning and zoning public works. Each commune has its heritage and its budget, which is set in the Annual Budget of the city. But during the first two years, the budget for all districts may not exceed 5% of the Expenditure Budget and Calculation of City Resources. The government of the communes is exercised by a Community Board, composed of seven members. Members are elected by direct vote of the neighbors, respecting the system of proportional representation, and remain in office for four years. It was also created a Community Advisory Board, composed of representatives of nongovernmental neighborhood associations, political parties and other forms of organization with interests or acting on the territory of the Commune. In addition to the Community Board is the Advisory Council, made voluntarily by neighbors, pro bono, to cooperate with the Board by identifying problems and monitor their performance. At this point, there are advisory councils in various communes, some operating since 2006, despite everything they did the directors of the respective CGPC (following the instructions of the executive) to disrupt them and discourage participation in them. It is pathetic to see tearing his hair out a government-and, worse still, many citizens, for the expropriation of a private company operating in another country. Never like these days we can see the true interests of neoliberalism that dominates us. Less than two ministers appear to "advertise" with gravity, measures against Argentina to regain control of their oil company YPF, the same day in which plunders a little Spanish public education and a few after they communicate by a press cutting of 10,000 million euros in this area and health, or were attending to the flight of stunned speechless by the President Rajoy garage to avoid facing the Senate to explain to journalists. There are many shades of murky story right now shaken by a Spanish ultranationalist take away these oils. REPSOL, the company expropriated by Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner in Argentina's YPF section, NOT SPANISH. More than half of its shareholders are foreign. Spanish was privatized but we the governments of Felipe González (retaining most decisive) and Aznar (the settled). Instructive to review their current shareholding. And its board of directors. Among the vanguard of those who make a killing at our expense, there are for example Luis Carlos Coissier. In his chapter Reacts essential reading today-of-Angels MartÃnez Castells explained to us how this former socialist minister advised the flotation of public companies from his post as chairman of INI begin to realize Carlos Solchaga since 1985. Similarly, in Acts, Angels warns us of what privatization means and the plundering of the healing that is ultimately our health and our lives. REPSOL YPF nor pay the taxes you owe in Spain and has subsidiaries in tax havens. To understand, is more of the Cayman Islands than anywhere else. Argentina is in the nineties with the devastating effects of large rehearsal neoliberal in its ground-launched in Pinochet's Chile and harmful local rulers that would lead to "the yard". And sells its oil to multinational non-Spanish-REPSOL. And now for the retakes. Is it lawful to do so, our legislation also makes the possibility of re-nationalize natural resources in strategic sectors such as energy. Too bad … the Kirchner support the sale of YPF in their day and remain unclear perks for local shareholdings. Come on, a pure shady. Either way, oil is Argentine and Spanish would be the operation and management of oil through a public REPSOL. Is not the case. Although we could also think of his "recovery." Nothing is further from the present moment. The PP government protests are for show and have little sign of success, at least in the short term. Cristina Fernandez also threat-not surprisingly-to renationalise electricity sectors, banking and telecommunications (oh, another privatizas Spanish public companies), which is what happens when one has the resources in this world of the alleged predator "free market" neoliberal. Make no mistake this is corporate globalization, citizens do not have anything. Rather, yes, to pay for the excesses of neoliberalism. And in any case, companies should resolve conflicts between them. On the other hand, a Mariano Rajoy who beat their first trip abroad as president to claim Gibraltar! to the neoliberal colleague Cameron, now flies to repudiate patriotism that Argentina do the same with their oil. A pure nonsense. They defend these rulers (and numerous emporiums of communication) to a firm as much, half Spanish, while leaving citizens defenseless against the spoliation of key services such as health, education, culture, the ability to prosper with the research and science. Joining the expropriation advised neoliberal religion of labor rights and citizens. As we see, also some democratic rights. Who governs? Today many people should have it much clearer. Privatization is expropriation. No consideration. Indeed, the PSOE PP Rubalcaba supports the REPSOL shtick. Somehow Argentina's example shows us where they lead by example policies that perpetrated the PP and all the blue court of Brussels, with Merkel at the helm. We do not say only a few rare, it says Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitiz. And what is more transparent: the evidence of the facts, let the free fall. Through, for example, harassment of